Open
Conversation
dragonhunt02
suggested changes
Jun 13, 2025
| api_key: System.get_env("SENDGRID_API_KEY", "") | ||
|
|
||
| database_url = | ||
| System.get_env("DATABASE_URL") || |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This part raises an error at mix uro.apigen step. We might need some defaults to run the command at build phase
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The configuration fixes pulled from my other PR.
we were missing a runtime.exs file, which should set some configuration at runtime instead of using some of the handrolled utils.
We also put a lot of dev assumptions in the config.exs instead of the dev.exs. That could be a security issue if dev settings accidentally made it into prod, so i moved those into the dev.exs
I haven't had the chance to thuroughly test these changes, so that should be done before merging