8372831: [lworld] com/sun/jdi/EATests.java#id0 fails with --enable-preview

[plummercj]

Don't run the EARelockingValueBased subtest when using --enable-preview.

The switch from driver to main is needed in order to get the test to run with preview enabled when it is specified.

When value types move out of preview, the EARelockingValueBased test will need to be removed.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Committer)

Error

 ⚠️ Pull request body is missing required line: - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Issue

• JDK-8372831: [lworld] com/sun/jdi/EATests.java#id0 fails with --enable-preview (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Paul Hübner (@Arraying - Committer) ⚠️ Review applies to fbbdb08e

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/2313/head:pull/2313
$ git checkout pull/2313

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2313
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/2313/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2313

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2313

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2313.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into lworld will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@plummercj This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (19d00c13)
• 00: Full (fbbdb08e)

[dean-long]

Unless the changes were contributed by SAP, I think we need an Oracle copyright line here.

[plummercj]

Fixed. Thanks.

[Arraying]

Except for the pending copyright comment, the test changes look fine. Thanks for investigating and fixing!

[plummercj]

@dean-long @Arraying For anyone reviewing this PR, please also look at openjdk/jdk#30560. There are a few ways of addressing this issue and there isn't consensus yet on which way to go about it. openjdk/jdk#30560 (comment) is a good summary of the 4 possible ways I can envision addressing this issue. They all have different pros and cons.